Chancellor Mertz should apologise

Why on earth Chancellor Mertz thought it was wise, necessary or justified to declare that the US has been humiliated by Iran is a matter for him. But his statement has brought relations between Washington and Berlin to a new low. And now, in retaliation, Donald Trump is to pull 5,000 American troops out of Germany to punish Mertz for his indiscretion. It strikes me that European leaders are suddenly feeling more confident about criticising Trump, never mind the consequences. But this is bad diplomacy, bad leadership and very bad for the Nato alliance which, of course, is still led by the US. What does Mertz want? Does he want to split the alliance? Does he think the alliance should become a Germany-led organisation and kick out the Americans? If so, no one is going to thank him, least of all the rest of the European members of the alliance. Yes, Europe should spend more on defence, but the Nato alliance is based on the Washington Treaty. The Washington Treaty! With the US at its head. And that's the way it must remain while Russia is becoming more and more aggressive. Mertz and his fellow European leaders must bite their tongues before they come out in public and make imprudent remarks. Mertz should apologise to Trump and make up.

Asymmetry wins wars - think David and Goliath

In case all the world's leaders have not yet got the message. Asymmetry versus might is what lets the little ones get one over the big ones. David got the idea when he faced Goliath. Paul Newman did it right when he faced the huge rival who wanted to take over his gang in Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid. He stepped forward to shake his hand before the fight to the death began and then kicked him hard between the legs. Fight over. The Taliban defeated the US-led coalition in Afghanistan with AK47s, roadside bombs and rocket-propelled grenades. Ukraine stopped the Russian invasion seizing the whole country with shoulder-launched anti-tank missiles and drones. Now Iran has halted the US in its tracks by seizing control of the Strait of Hormuz, causing chaos in the oil business and world trade. It's the Iranian version of Paul Newman's kick in the balls. Asymmetry works. It's clever, it's cheap and it's massively frustrating for a military power which has every armament in the books at its disposal. So, what to do? The US is not going to win this war unless Trump send hundreds of thousands of troops into Iran to topple the regime and seize all of its enriched uranium. And we know he is not going to do that. Tehran and the clerics know he's not going to do that. So there is no alternative but a deal. And the way things are going it's not going to be a win win deal for the US. Just a deal which Trump can attempt to sell to the American people and to the world as a victory. PLEASE BUY AGENT REDRUTH, MY NEW SPY THRILLER. AMAZON, WATERSTONES, ROWANVALE BOOKS.

Trump and Putin have a war each to chat about

Amidst all the turmoil of the wars in Ukraine and Iran, President Donald Trump and President Vladimir Putin had time - quite a lot of time by the sound of it - to compare warlike notes and offer each other help and advice. It's bizarre. The two leaders get on well but they can't trust each other. The evidence of that is that they never do deals together. Putin has ignored Trump's efforts to end the war in Ukraine, and Trump has rejected Putin's offer of taking possession of Iran's enriched uranium. Trump wants that stuff in HIS hands, or at least in the ownership of the United States, so that it can be destroyed. Nevertheless, the two leaders had a long chat and I guess that is good, even though it didn't get anywhere. Putin and Trump have nowe spoken on the phone about a dozen times. Has the world got safer as a result? Difficult to tell. But the one thing these chats haven't done is bring a peaceful solution to either of the wars currently affecting the whole world. Trump, in his usual optimistic way, tells reporters after the latest talk with Putin that he thinks the war in Ukraine will come to an end soon, just like he has always said the war in Iran is nearly over. But But Ukraine is not going to end the war on Putin's terms, and the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps is not going to concede to Trump's demands. So, there is no end on sight for either of these wars.

UK ambassador to Washington betrayed by sixth-form visitor

Sir Christian Turner, Britain's ambassador to Washington, is the latest victim of a breach of confidence. He gave up his valuable time to see a bunch of sixth-formers for a session at the embassy and spoke to them privately about some of his views. This took place in February but now, timed to perfection, as King Charles and Camilla carry out a state visit to the United States, one of the sixth-formers or their parents or whoever, has leaked the contens of the ambassador's address to them to the Financial Times. He is now in odour with his bosses at the Foreign Office because his remarks are perceived to be embarrassing to HM Government. Actually, he didn't say anything very controversial. He said America's real special relationship was not with Britain but with Israel. Correct. Then he expressed amazement that no senior figure in the US, unlike in the UK, had been investigated or pilloried for being connected to Jeffry Epstein, the late and unlamented sex trafficker. True. And then he predicted that Sir Keir Starmer probably won't survive as prime minister over the Peter Mandelson scandal. Sir Christian Turner succeeded Mandelson after he was fired as UK ambassador to Washington. He's probably right. But, of course, when this all comes out of the mouth of the ambassador at a time when relations - except with the king - are so poor between Britain and Trumpland, it has been blown up into another example of a top diplomnat being terribly indiscreet. I feel sorry for the guy. It just shows you can't trust anyone these days. Why did someone in the party privileged to chat with the ambassador in a specially-arranged visit to the embassy, feel it was ok to betray the confidence and blurt it all out to a newspaper? Whoever it was, they should be ashamed. PLEASE BUY AGENT REDRUTH, MY NEW SPY THRILLER. AMAZON, WATERSTONES, ROWANVALE BOOKS.

Russian superyacht gets a free pass through the Strait of Hormuz

This is the way it's going to be for ever. Iran, or in reality the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, will pick and choose who to let through the Strait of Hormuz. Us warships? No way. A western-flagged oil tanker? No chance. A Russian superyacht, owned by a billionaire and pal of Vladimir Putin? Be our guest. Before the war against Iran started, more than 130 ships were going through the strait without interference from the IRGC and without any toll system. Now the IRGC is totally in charge, and nothing is getting through except with its permission. Thus, the Russian superyacht. The Iranian foreign minister had talks in Moscow the other day and I assume the superyacht request must have been raised. It's both ironic and ominous that it has become so easy for the IRGC to do what the hell it likes in the strait and the US with all of its naval power seems to be able to do very little about it, other than impose a blockade of the Iranian blockade. If the US naval blockade is maintained and the Iranians can't use any of their ports for importing and exporting, then it should on the face of it drive Iran into penury pretty quickly. But it seems Iran has the ability to absorb terrible punishment and yet just carry on. At some point there will have to be a point of no return for the Iranian economy and the IRGC will come begging for a deal. But they are showing no sign of backing down right now or in the foreseeable future. PLEASE BUY AGENT REDRUTH, MY NEW SPY THRILLER. AMAZON, WATERSTONES, ROWANVALE BOOKS.

Iran tries to take the upper hand

Iran has made its first move to try and push Washington into a deal which will favour the Tehran regime. It won't work but it demonstrates how the generals of the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps are thinking. Their idea is that the Strait of Hormuz will be reopened and any talks about Iran's uranium-enrichment programme should be suapended for a future time. It looks tempting, especially for a US president who must be getting uneasy about how the war in Iran is going to affect the Republicans' chances in the mid-term elections in November. If he loses control of the Senate and the House of Representatives, his final two and a half years are going to be obstructed and stymied by a rampant Democratic party. But the Iranians have been clever. When they promise to reopen the Strait of Hormuz they are not suggesting Tehran will give up all control of the waterway. They just say they will agree to reopen it. So that can't be acceptable. As for the nuke programme, this is the biggest bugbear for Trump. He has to be the president who gets this huge issue resolved for good, but the IRGC which runs the nuclear programme are not going to give up this potential capability. So Trump will have to reject the latest move. But could it lead to something more workable? Let us hope so.

Could Trump's hopes for a deal rest with a wounded ayatollah?

With the generals in charge in Tehran there is no hope of a deal with the US. The military, at least in the form of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard, don't understand or seek compromise and just want revenge. So is it the case that if there is to be any kind of settlement everything will rest on whether the new supreme leader, the severely wounded and incapacitated Ayatollah Mojtaba Khamenei, recovers sufficiently to make a huge decision to go for peace? He has a history of alliance with the IRGC, so the chances are slim. The problem at the moment is that he can't speak because of facial injuries and by all accounts is waiting for a prosthetic for his amputated leg. So he is in no position to make such a decision, and even if he did, would the generals listen? There is absolutely no evidence that the latest supreme leader is a reformist or a moderate thinker. But when all the economic facts are put before him about Iran's current dire state, could he begin to think that a continuing war is not in his country's interest. The generals don't seem to care. There is no division in Tehran right now because the generals are united and they don't have to worry about the supreme leader disagreeing with them. But if Trump is going to get a deal, the White House must be praying that the injured leader comes to his senses, in every meaning of the words.